<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for stephaniedraven.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stephaniedraven.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stephaniedraven.com</link>
	<description>Modern Mythology with a Sexy Edge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 02:31:59 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Spring Contest 2010 by Tanja</title>
		<link>http://stephaniedraven.com/2010/03/07/spring-contest-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-582</link>
		<dc:creator>Tanja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 02:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephaniedraven.com/?p=1465#comment-582</guid>
		<description>http://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/292166-25-7-ashley-fl-s-task-the-gods-must-be-crazy

Then dropped into a private Goodreads Group - cannot give link since you need to be a member to read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/292166-25-7-ashley-fl-s-task-the-gods-must-be-crazy" rel="nofollow">http://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/292166-25-7-ashley-fl-s-task-the-gods-must-be-crazy</a></p>
<p>Then dropped into a private Goodreads Group &#8211; cannot give link since you need to be a member to read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Spring Contest 2010 by ann</title>
		<link>http://stephaniedraven.com/2010/03/07/spring-contest-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-581</link>
		<dc:creator>ann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 00:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephaniedraven.com/?p=1465#comment-581</guid>
		<description>Joined the newsletter!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joined the newsletter!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Spring Contest 2010 by Shelby</title>
		<link>http://stephaniedraven.com/2010/03/07/spring-contest-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-580</link>
		<dc:creator>Shelby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 00:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephaniedraven.com/?p=1465#comment-580</guid>
		<description>Joined the newsletter! (Probably should have done this /ages/ ago)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joined the newsletter! (Probably should have done this /ages/ ago)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Winter Contest 2009 by Donna Holmberg</title>
		<link>http://stephaniedraven.com/2009/12/15/winter-contest-2009/comment-page-2/#comment-579</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna Holmberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 23:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephaniedraven.com/?p=1041#comment-579</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m SOOOO Excited... I won!  WOO HOO... and just in time, too because I&#039;m done with Night Angel and ready for a new book to read now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m SOOOO Excited&#8230; I won!  WOO HOO&#8230; and just in time, too because I&#8217;m done with Night Angel and ready for a new book to read now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Spring Contest 2010 by Lura</title>
		<link>http://stephaniedraven.com/2010/03/07/spring-contest-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-578</link>
		<dc:creator>Lura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 02:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephaniedraven.com/?p=1465#comment-578</guid>
		<description>Joined/Subscribed to Newsletter. ^_^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joined/Subscribed to Newsletter. ^_^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Spring Contest 2010 by Tanja</title>
		<link>http://stephaniedraven.com/2010/03/07/spring-contest-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-577</link>
		<dc:creator>Tanja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 01:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephaniedraven.com/?p=1465#comment-577</guid>
		<description>Did the name drop on the Urban Fantasy Goodreads Group count?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did the name drop on the Urban Fantasy Goodreads Group count?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Spring Contest 2010 by Kelli Owens</title>
		<link>http://stephaniedraven.com/2010/03/07/spring-contest-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-576</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelli Owens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 01:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephaniedraven.com/?p=1465#comment-576</guid>
		<description>Joined the newsletter!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joined the newsletter!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Spring Contest 2010 by Lou Gagliardi</title>
		<link>http://stephaniedraven.com/2010/03/07/spring-contest-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-575</link>
		<dc:creator>Lou Gagliardi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 01:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephaniedraven.com/?p=1465#comment-575</guid>
		<description>http://twitter.com/theloug/status/10146458692</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://twitter.com/theloug/status/10146458692" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/theloug/status/10146458692</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Winter Contest 2009 by Stephanie Draven</title>
		<link>http://stephaniedraven.com/2009/12/15/winter-contest-2009/comment-page-2/#comment-573</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie Draven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 00:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephaniedraven.com/?p=1041#comment-573</guid>
		<description>And the winner is Donna Holmberg! Thanks for participating, everybody!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the winner is Donna Holmberg! Thanks for participating, everybody!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Excerpt Monday: Rites of Passage Part II by Stephanie Draven</title>
		<link>http://stephaniedraven.com/2010/02/15/excerpt-monday-rites-of-passage-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-570</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie Draven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 03:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephaniedraven.com/?p=1353#comment-570</guid>
		<description>Thanks Alexia. I like to be intriguing ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Alexia. I like to be intriguing <img src='http://stephaniedraven.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Excerpt Monday: Rites of Passage Part II by Alexia Reed</title>
		<link>http://stephaniedraven.com/2010/02/15/excerpt-monday-rites-of-passage-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-569</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexia Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 02:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephaniedraven.com/?p=1353#comment-569</guid>
		<description>I can always be sure that I&#039;ll be intrigued when I read something of yours.  This is no different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can always be sure that I&#8217;ll be intrigued when I read something of yours.  This is no different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hello Ladies&#8230; by Liss</title>
		<link>http://stephaniedraven.com/2010/03/03/hello-ladies/comment-page-1/#comment-566</link>
		<dc:creator>Liss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 12:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephaniedraven.com/?p=1454#comment-566</guid>
		<description>Yeah, this commercial makes me laugh every time.  Even my husband is amused.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, this commercial makes me laugh every time.  Even my husband is amused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Romantica Trends by Angie</title>
		<link>http://stephaniedraven.com/2010/02/28/new-romantica-trends/comment-page-1/#comment-565</link>
		<dc:creator>Angie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 12:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephaniedraven.com/?p=1446#comment-565</guid>
		<description>On being subversive, some people can break the rules and get away with it, but on the racks at WalMart, you generally have to be a Big Name already to get away with it.  The first thing that comes to my mind is one of Jo Beverly&#039;s books, where the couple was having a fight and Lucien smacked Beth.  As soon as he did it, he was all, &quot;OMGWTFBBQ!!!&quot; over what he&#039;d done, and I, at least, was pretty sure before too long that he was truly appalled at himself and that he wouldn&#039;t do it again.  When they went out and met with some of his long-time friends, Beth still with a bruise on her face, all his friends were clearly on Beth&#039;s side, and some were pretty mad at him for it, modelling an appropriate (if probably anachronistic) community response to the issue.  I thought she handled the whole thing very well, and showed some guts for bringing a serious, real-world issue into a mainstream romance.  Susie Midlist would never have gotten away with that, though.

My biggest act of subversion so far was writing a paranormal where one of the guys (Kevin) was dead at the beginning, and didn&#039;t get better by the end.  [wry smile]  I thought the ending was properly positive and hopeful, but a few people seem to have disagreed.  Messing with the HEA/HFN is one of the things that can still get you into trouble no matter where in the romance-umbrella genre you are.  My story was more of a, &quot;Wait a little while, then in the future be happy together FOREVER&quot; and I thought the &quot;forever&quot; part would make up for the wait.  Now I know better, LOL!  Not that I&#039;d have written it differently, even knowing; it&#039;s still my favorite of all my published stories.

But I wrote a sequel, showing that during the wait, the guy (Josh, who was still alive) met someone else (Jeff, a nice bisexual widower) and got married, and he and his husband got together with a lesbian couple and had a daughter for all of them to raise, and they had grandkids eventually.  The point being, though, that he &lt;i&gt;didn&#039;t&lt;/i&gt; just sit and pine, looking sadly out the window at the sad clouds and rain for the next forty-some years, which is what would probably have been expected of him if he&#039;d been a she and I&#039;d published this on the mainstream het side.

One reader, commenting on the sequel, was all, &quot;But wait, what about Jeff??  And Beth?  [Jeff&#039;s dead wife]  You need to write another sequel -- four-way in heaven!!&quot;  [giggling facepalm]

Maybe some day.  :D

Angie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On being subversive, some people can break the rules and get away with it, but on the racks at WalMart, you generally have to be a Big Name already to get away with it.  The first thing that comes to my mind is one of Jo Beverly&#8217;s books, where the couple was having a fight and Lucien smacked Beth.  As soon as he did it, he was all, &#8220;OMGWTFBBQ!!!&#8221; over what he&#8217;d done, and I, at least, was pretty sure before too long that he was truly appalled at himself and that he wouldn&#8217;t do it again.  When they went out and met with some of his long-time friends, Beth still with a bruise on her face, all his friends were clearly on Beth&#8217;s side, and some were pretty mad at him for it, modelling an appropriate (if probably anachronistic) community response to the issue.  I thought she handled the whole thing very well, and showed some guts for bringing a serious, real-world issue into a mainstream romance.  Susie Midlist would never have gotten away with that, though.</p>
<p>My biggest act of subversion so far was writing a paranormal where one of the guys (Kevin) was dead at the beginning, and didn&#8217;t get better by the end.  [wry smile]  I thought the ending was properly positive and hopeful, but a few people seem to have disagreed.  Messing with the HEA/HFN is one of the things that can still get you into trouble no matter where in the romance-umbrella genre you are.  My story was more of a, &#8220;Wait a little while, then in the future be happy together FOREVER&#8221; and I thought the &#8220;forever&#8221; part would make up for the wait.  Now I know better, LOL!  Not that I&#8217;d have written it differently, even knowing; it&#8217;s still my favorite of all my published stories.</p>
<p>But I wrote a sequel, showing that during the wait, the guy (Josh, who was still alive) met someone else (Jeff, a nice bisexual widower) and got married, and he and his husband got together with a lesbian couple and had a daughter for all of them to raise, and they had grandkids eventually.  The point being, though, that he <i>didn&#8217;t</i> just sit and pine, looking sadly out the window at the sad clouds and rain for the next forty-some years, which is what would probably have been expected of him if he&#8217;d been a she and I&#8217;d published this on the mainstream het side.</p>
<p>One reader, commenting on the sequel, was all, &#8220;But wait, what about Jeff??  And Beth?  [Jeff's dead wife]  You need to write another sequel &#8212; four-way in heaven!!&#8221;  [giggling facepalm]</p>
<p>Maybe some day.  <img src='http://stephaniedraven.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Angie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hello Ladies&#8230; by Angie</title>
		<link>http://stephaniedraven.com/2010/03/03/hello-ladies/comment-page-1/#comment-564</link>
		<dc:creator>Angie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 12:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephaniedraven.com/?p=1454#comment-564</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t that a great commercial??  My husband and I both cracked up when we first saw it, although I&#039;ll admit I was the only one ogling while laughing.  :D

Angie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t that a great commercial??  My husband and I both cracked up when we first saw it, although I&#8217;ll admit I was the only one ogling while laughing.  <img src='http://stephaniedraven.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Angie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hello Ladies&#8230; by Liz Pelletier</title>
		<link>http://stephaniedraven.com/2010/03/03/hello-ladies/comment-page-1/#comment-563</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz Pelletier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 08:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephaniedraven.com/?p=1454#comment-563</guid>
		<description>OMG That was hysterical! Now, back at me. I&#039;m on a horse. LMAO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG That was hysterical! Now, back at me. I&#8217;m on a horse. LMAO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Romantica Trends by Stephanie Draven</title>
		<link>http://stephaniedraven.com/2010/02/28/new-romantica-trends/comment-page-1/#comment-562</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie Draven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 17:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephaniedraven.com/?p=1446#comment-562</guid>
		<description>Angie, you make some really good points. I often find myself frustrated by the strictures in mainstream romance and I try to break the rules as often as I can. I&#039;m a subversive. :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Angie, you make some really good points. I often find myself frustrated by the strictures in mainstream romance and I try to break the rules as often as I can. I&#8217;m a subversive. <img src='http://stephaniedraven.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Romantica Trends by Angie</title>
		<link>http://stephaniedraven.com/2010/02/28/new-romantica-trends/comment-page-1/#comment-561</link>
		<dc:creator>Angie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 07:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephaniedraven.com/?p=1446#comment-561</guid>
		<description>Same with m/m.  [nod]  I think it&#039;s because the mainstream romance genre has been around long enough, and has been under the internet microscope for long enough, that it&#039;s developed a lot of rules and guidelines and exclusions, such that it&#039;s actually pretty tough to innovate in any but a few accepted directions.  You can come up with a new setting -- like paranormal, or a new historical time/place (if you can get a publisher to take a chance on a historical era with no track record) -- or give your character(s) a job or avocation which is cool and interesting but hasn&#039;t been used yet.  But character behavior is very rigidly policed, and writers who step a toe out of the boundaries on that side of the genre are snarked and flamed to a fine crisp.

Erotic romance and m/m both are both relatively new (at least on the commercial side) and have both grown up in relative isolation, apart from mainstream het romance.  We have our own rules and tropes, yes, but they&#039;re different from those of the mainstream, and there aren&#039;t as many of them.  If I want my protag to meet the Other Guy, then have sex with five other guys before he and the Other Guy (who&#039;ll end up being his True Love) actually get together and form a stable couple, I can do that on the m/m side and no one will pop a gasket.  Not so on the mainstream het side.  If you want to write about a woman who has a lot of sexual experience with a lot of different men, but then meets Her Guy and falls in love and gets married, without regretting her past or beating herself up over it, you can do that.  Not so on the mainstream het side.

The readers will accept more variation in character values and behavior in our chunks of the genre, which is one of the reasons I love writing here.  Within the boundaries, mainstream het can produce some wonderful stories, yes.  But it&#039;s like wanting to write poetry and being restricted to only sonnets; sonnets are beautiful, but I want &lt;i&gt;more.&lt;/i&gt;  M/m and erotic romance gives us, as writers, that &quot;more&quot; -- the extra freedom and elbow room to create without running up against barbed wire and flamethrowers.

Angie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same with m/m.  [nod]  I think it&#8217;s because the mainstream romance genre has been around long enough, and has been under the internet microscope for long enough, that it&#8217;s developed a lot of rules and guidelines and exclusions, such that it&#8217;s actually pretty tough to innovate in any but a few accepted directions.  You can come up with a new setting &#8212; like paranormal, or a new historical time/place (if you can get a publisher to take a chance on a historical era with no track record) &#8212; or give your character(s) a job or avocation which is cool and interesting but hasn&#8217;t been used yet.  But character behavior is very rigidly policed, and writers who step a toe out of the boundaries on that side of the genre are snarked and flamed to a fine crisp.</p>
<p>Erotic romance and m/m both are both relatively new (at least on the commercial side) and have both grown up in relative isolation, apart from mainstream het romance.  We have our own rules and tropes, yes, but they&#8217;re different from those of the mainstream, and there aren&#8217;t as many of them.  If I want my protag to meet the Other Guy, then have sex with five other guys before he and the Other Guy (who&#8217;ll end up being his True Love) actually get together and form a stable couple, I can do that on the m/m side and no one will pop a gasket.  Not so on the mainstream het side.  If you want to write about a woman who has a lot of sexual experience with a lot of different men, but then meets Her Guy and falls in love and gets married, without regretting her past or beating herself up over it, you can do that.  Not so on the mainstream het side.</p>
<p>The readers will accept more variation in character values and behavior in our chunks of the genre, which is one of the reasons I love writing here.  Within the boundaries, mainstream het can produce some wonderful stories, yes.  But it&#8217;s like wanting to write poetry and being restricted to only sonnets; sonnets are beautiful, but I want <i>more.</i>  M/m and erotic romance gives us, as writers, that &#8220;more&#8221; &#8212; the extra freedom and elbow room to create without running up against barbed wire and flamethrowers.</p>
<p>Angie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Winter Contest 2009 by Marlene Breakfield</title>
		<link>http://stephaniedraven.com/2009/12/15/winter-contest-2009/comment-page-2/#comment-560</link>
		<dc:creator>Marlene Breakfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 01:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephaniedraven.com/?p=1041#comment-560</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m reading THE ELUSIVE BRIDE by Laurens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m reading THE ELUSIVE BRIDE by Laurens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Are Angels the New Trend in Spec Fic? by Bandidos Motorcycle Gang Massacre &#124; Motor Cycle Now</title>
		<link>http://stephaniedraven.com/2010/02/23/why-are-angels-the-new-trend-in-spec-fic/comment-page-1/#comment-558</link>
		<dc:creator>Bandidos Motorcycle Gang Massacre &#124; Motor Cycle Now</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephaniedraven.com/?p=1306#comment-558</guid>
		<description>[...] stephaniedraven.com » Blog Archive » Why Are Angels the New Trend &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] stephaniedraven.com » Blog Archive » Why Are Angels the New Trend &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Excerpt Monday: Rites of Passage Part II by Stephanie Draven</title>
		<link>http://stephaniedraven.com/2010/02/15/excerpt-monday-rites-of-passage-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-557</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie Draven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 05:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephaniedraven.com/?p=1353#comment-557</guid>
		<description>Oh, Kellie, Urtenia features prominently in this book!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, Kellie, Urtenia features prominently in this book!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
